Nov 6, 2019, 12:51 by [email protected]:
> > > On 06/11/2019 12:12, The one with the questions wrote: > >> As you now obviously and knowingly shared (and created?) a fake protocol >> > > "fake" is not a good choice of word > > The character assassination has been removed, the empty spaces replaced > with a history of what went wrong in FSFE. > > But none of that really matters: what matters is the question: why did > 11 members of FSFE e.V. travel to Essen for a weekend and pass a motion > abusing a single volunteer? > The paragraph "Dealing with situations created by Daniel Pocock" is a complete different one in your fake version compared the original version, everyone can verify it. I'm not the one who judge here, I'm just the one with the questions, so let me repeat them as you didn't answered them yet: Are you also the author of the fake protocols shared before? Why do you do this? Why do you want to trick your friends and Free Software Fellows on this list? Are we just your sock puppets in yout fight against software freedom? > They obviously have nothing more useful to do with their time. > Do you have more useful thing to do then modifying official documents to fit your hidden agenda? -- Just asking questions...
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
