There you go, being all ethical again. Other than exposing them, what options are there to remove the corrupt elements?
Sincerely, Patrick Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 6, 2019, at 1:14 PM, Daniel Pocock <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 06/11/2019 19:08, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote: >> >> El 2019-11-06 06:12, The one with the questions escribió: >>> https://fsfe.org/about/legal/minutes/minutes-2019-10-12.en.pdf >> >> I am very sorry to have read in this document that a contributor is >> discredited just because what he/she says makes some people >> uncomfortable. I think that the FSFE should worry more about protecting >> freedoms than to make a mob attack on someone who does not agree with >> them. Discussions between people of medium intelligence do not need to >> be hampered by a thin skin. That only should happen to very basic minds. > > As I was a community representative, it was my responsibility to speak > up confidently about problems. > > If they feel uncomfortable with a community representative, is that > because they have things to hide[1] from the community? > > The accusation they are making is that I was a diligent representative > who performed the role well. > > This is a voluntary role, I wasn't even paid for it. > > Regards, > > Daniel > > > 1. https://fsfellowship.eu/2019/01/26/fsfe-behavior-standards.html > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
