On 21/03/2021 18:10, MJ Ray wrote: > > > Le 21 mars 2021 10:12:38 GMT+00:00, [email protected] a écrit : >> Personally, I think what's happening at Techrights is a farce. They're >> bowing to censors and will probably reverse the decision several times. But >> if they don't, you should know the following: >> >> Even the person asking for him to be censored admits Pocock has posted >> useful information about the FSFE. >> 2. Techrights and their readership directly benefited from that information. >> >> 3. Techrights does not technically HAVE TO censor in this way, but it's >> becoming a point of friction which their web host. > > Only point 3 is evidenced by your post and, as others post, this is not > censorship even if is a sort of interference with editorial policy. > > Censorship would be taking the original site down. > > Compare: is it censorship if a TV network does not continue buying and > broadcasting some bought-in show?
These vigorous efforts to censor concern the article about Jonathan Wiltshire in the Debian Account Managers team, his physical proximity to GCHQ and his employer receiving British government contracts. https://debian.community/jonathan-wiltshire-debian-falsified-harassment-claims-tiger-computing-gchq/ http://techrights.org/2020/10/26/jonathan-wiltshire-gchq-theory/ The image: https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmereN1pANAgeiwPZiADehPsNKwrye4qpFB8YhTLqcGNDQ If many people replicate the image using IPFS and post it on other web sites, it will remove the pressure on specific sites like Techrights https://ipfs.io/ > defending someone i know to be a rapist If accusers are so certain that Jacob Appelbaum is a rapist, why do they spend so much time trying to censor web sites but in four years, not one accuser had time to visit a police station and file a report? Everybody is innocent until proven guilty. Even the GCHQ agents. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
