On 8/12/05, Rui Correia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, that's fair ;). > Let's face it. > It won't make it in time for Beta1 so it's not going to be available on > pfSense 1.0. > But anyway I think you guys and I would all like to see it coming back > for 1.1 or 1.2. > That is whenever any of these versions are out. > In such sense, I'll try to contact Peter so that maybe he can tell us > where the bugs are. > BTW, do you know if these bugs are popping up on m0n0wall 1.2b9 too?
These are not bugs but the design decision of Peter to utilize optional interfaces for the ipsec configuration. > In the current scenario you won't be able to run any testings with any > fixes that Peter could send us. > And that's because you will be pushing hard for a 1.0, so there wouldn't > be any reason for bugging Peter right now since you guys won't have time > to test the submitted fixes. > But if it's broken on m0n0wall's code too, then maybe I could ask Peter > to check it and submit the fixes to Manuel too and maybe he has time to > see if it works. > And then it might be easy to incorporate those fixes on pfSense too. > Just a thought... > Anyway, thank you both Scott and Chris for putting up with my personal > questions/requests :). Peter stated that he had patches to fix the optional interface fiasco and that also adds bridging support. That is what (we) are waiting for. Scott
