Scott mentioned that functionality required ifdepd .. preempt results in the
same behavior?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] wan interface failed causing carp failover
That's why a single interface failure didn't fail the whole box over then.
--Bill
On 8/26/05, Matthew Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
not currently no. Mainly cuz I have two firewalls I need to test new
versions of pfsense before I can fail it over and upgrade the current
MASTER for all the carp interfaces. Once I have everything production
ready i'll probably enable preempt again.
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:03 -0500, Bill Marquette wrote:
> Are you using pre-empt?
>
> --Bill
>
> On 8/26/05, Matthew Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I had an interesting thing happen today. The watchdog (atleast thats
> > what
> > the system log called it) on my WAN interface reset the WAN interface
> > (any
> > idea why that would have happened?) which caused all my outbound NAT
> > to
> > longer work. All my private gw (LAN/OPT*) carp interfaces/ips were
> > still
> > MASTER on fw0 but the the public (WAN) carp interface/ip to which I
> > bound
> > all my outbound NAT failed over to fw1.
> >
> > Should this have continued to function?
> >
> > It didn't. I had to disable carp on fw1 to let it the public carp
> > interface
> > fail back to fw0 (where all the other private carp interfaces were
> > still
> > MASTER). It almost seems that all the carp interfaces/ips need to
> > failover
> > if one of them goes down. Am I missing something? I'm sure I must be.
> >
