On 9/1/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The scheduling is the difficult one...it really really needs to be part of > PF before we can add it (and if it requires polling servers, I can guarantee > it won't make it in). Bottom line is we aren't a load balancer, this wasn't > a terribly difficult feature to add, but full blown load balancer features > would be. I wouldn't expect much more from our LB implementation, it wasn't > ever designed to replace an F5 or Foundry box, just supply an easy to use, > quick and minimal LB.
I wouldn't let the above discourage people that are on these platforms to give us a try. I really would like to see feedback of future direction. As we're a very young project I'm quite surprised we've got this many features before release. So any feedback you can give will help out a lot (good or bad!) Scott
