I took it out of my camera, it's back in there now.
:)
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig FALCONER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: [pfSense-discussion] CF Card Size
Use the 128 - it'll be fine. Put the 1Gb in your camera or flog it off to
someone with a CF based camera.
Or get a USB/CF reader and use it as portable storage :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mojo Jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 October 2005 5:06 p.m.
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] CF Card Size
Hmm..
OK, I just ripped out the 128mb thinking it was bad to use the minimum
recommended in a production system.
I was trying to set it up with a 1GB card but physdiskwrite complains that
it's over 800mb and won't write to it.
Anyhow, if you think it's fine for handling all of what a T1 can throw at
it, then I will just put the 128mb back in and make my life easier :)
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] CF Card Size
On 10/25/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know the minimum recommended CF card size for a WRAP setup is 128mb.
My question is what is appropriate for a fairly busy router in a
production environment using most of a T1, most of the time.
If you're just using the flash image, 128M card should be more than
adequate. We don't write anything to it (yet) so it should be happy.
Also, is the speed of the card important? The cards I have both say
"hi speed" but just curious if I even need "Hi Speed" cards or not.
I'm running my 4801 on a 128M SanDisk Industrial CF...it's SLLOOOWWWW, maybe
4x at best. Runs fine, if a hair slow...faster CF's will speed up the
WebGUI and boot, but won't help (or hinder) routing performance.
--Bill
