On 3/28/08, Dennis Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well you snipped the useful information. Then please snip it for us, since no one really has an interest in sifting through your 1055 other irrelevant log-spam lines.
> I hear not being an asshole is quite a virtue too. That's not going to win you any friends, particularly in CS/engineering circles where a large majority of us really don't care for other humans. Particularly on an email list, you should probably wait at least 48 hours before re-positing your question. It could even be that someone is silently replicating your implementation so they can provide a thoughtful response instead of an off-the-cuff one. As I am sure the situation is with many others on the list, I don't implement UPnP on my network for obvious security concerns, and disregarded your query largely because of that. If your problem is just that the messages are showing up, learn to live with it - lots of programs use shoddy logic in deciding which messages are useful and which are not. If you actually have a problem associated with the messages, then please discuss that.
