On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 18:45, Aristedes Maniatis<[email protected]> wrote: > That leaves 5. How flexible is pfSense's dead host detection? Instead of a > ping check can we substitute an arbitrary http check (at a minimum to check > for a 200 response, but ideally we want to perform a regex check to find > specific content on a page)? Or alternatively since we already have nagios > performing these checks can we use that to notify pfsense to perform a > failover?
I thought Chris would have mentioned it by now, but the features you've been asking about (cookies, dead host detection, etc.) are generally already in the unstable 2.0-alpha version using relayd. Not something you would want to run for production-critical workloads, but the groundwork is at least being laid. I do not see configuration options for SSL offload, but since relayd has the capability it's probably only a matter of time. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
