On Thursday 08 December 2005 12:11, Ido Abramovich wrote: > Is the "shell background" REALLY that necessary? >
Not absolutely, but I feel that an image background will add a lot of life to the site. > Nobody understands what it is now since it is covered > almost entirely by the nav-bar, This is now fixed in http://w2l.shlomifish.org/, in which the navigation bar was converted into a floaty. > what we do see is a > flashing disturbance on the peripheral when scrolling > down. I'm in constant fear that I'll develop epilepsy > by the background ;) This can be solved using the CSS "background-attachment: fixed" property. > > Besides, I'm sorry Shlomi, but the shell background is > just plain ugly. Well, ugly is a matter of opinion. I heard from two people besides me who liked it. And the important thing is to have some kind of background, not necessarily the clamshell one. > It's nice that you like it and that > you have the power to decide, but remember that the > page is not ment for you, and that a lot of people > already said that it gives the page an unprofessional > look. I see. If you can suggest a better background that I'd like, I'll replace it. > I'm sorry that I'm using harsh words, but softer words > where said by others with no effect. No offence taken. Regards, Shlomi Fish --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ 95% of the programmers consider 95% of the code they did not write, in the bottom 5%. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
