I've actually had a better idea. Rather than changing the ColumnDecorator interface, how about we add another Decorator type - a ControlDecorator? The ControlDecorator would create the form control, using the result of the ColumnDecorator as the display?
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I have been looking at adding some simple support to the Display Tag > foreditable > tables. My current idea is to extend the ColumnDecorator class's decorate > method. Currently, the method just takes the object value. My proposed > alteration would have the column name and row number passed in. This would > allow > a decorator to create a properly named form control. <snip> sam http://www.magpiebrain.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ displaytag-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/displaytag-devel
