> On that note I would like to get some input on a draft proposal I put
> together before I go ahead and start an exploratory implementation. It
> is available at [1], but I've copied the example from that document here
> to get some gut reactions.
Yay standards! Now for a bit of nitpicking:
>
> {
> "http://example.org/bug/12345"; : {
> "metadata" : {
> "title" : "There is no documentation",
> "create_date" : "2012-08-27 15:15 UTC",
> "date_modified" : "2012-08-28 12:03 UTC",
You may want to consider using ISO8601 timestamps
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
Your timestamp parameters may not want to use the word "date" if they're
actually timestamps.
You probably want to make those timestamp labels ordered the same (created_at &
last_modified_at ?)
_______________________________________________
dist-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://kitenet.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dist-bugs
