Hi. Travis Brown <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:39:29AM +0200, Olivier Berger claimed: > > I took at look at OSCL-CM and OSCL-Core last night. It's bit more > verbose then my proposal, but that's to be expected from a more flexible > spec. not counting the fact that some implementations only speak RDF/XML ;-) > My only concern is how to transfer comments on a bug inline. Uh... can you explicit a bit more what you're thinking about ? > From my reading it seems that it should be possible, but will likely > need at least one additional field in order to be robust. I stumbled > upon [0] yesterday which pressed home the need for some depth in the > comment threading information. OSCL doesn't seem to include this as > part of the existing spec. > Yet ;) I'm not sure if this has been investigated yet, but my suggestion would be to start discussing that on the OSLC community's channels. See : http://open-services.net/forums/ for instance. I'm sure people have investigated modeling email threads as RDF (using SWAML, SIOC, etc.), but how far such need has been investigated by OSLC, I don't know, so better ask people that are more up-to-date than me. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France) _______________________________________________ dist-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://kitenet.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dist-bugs
