On 4 Sep 2002, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 3, 2002, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This has a lot of fairly small bug fixes to try to address the > > problems reported last week. > > I was sure I was going to find this patch in 0.9, but as far as I can > tell it didn't make it :-(
Sorry, I meant to put it in, but I misunderstood it the first time. It's in CVS now, along with a regression test case. I can see how the gcc 3.1 manual does explain this behaviour (-S = stop after compilation), but it's a bit subtle. Do you know if that behaviour is the same in other compilers? -- Martin _______________________________________________ distcc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
