On Sep 4, 2002, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can see how the gcc 3.1 manual does explain this behaviour (-S = > stop after compilation), but it's a bit subtle. Do you know if that > behaviour is the same in other compilers?
It's always been like that in GCC, for as long as I remember. I suppose other compilers may just barf if given both -S and -c. I don't know of any one that takes -c -S as -c. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer _______________________________________________ distcc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
