Just want to clarify, so issue #1068 is used to track PR #1069? On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Updates: > > I merged the corresponding modules into a bk branch. details are described > in https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1068 > > A subsequent PR to integrate those modules with BK pom files. In this PR, > this modules will not be built unless `-Pdistributedlog` is provided. > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1069 > > Please help review it. > > - Sijie > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This BP is accepted. see details at : https://github.com/apache/ > > bookkeeper/pull/1025#issuecomment-360871025 > > > > I've updated the master ticket #1024 > > <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1024> with corresponding > sub > > tasks. > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:44 AM, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea < > >> enrico.olive...@diennea.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Il giorno ven, 19/01/2018 alle 13.17 -0800, Sijie Guo ha scritto: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I started a BP for proposing merging distributedlog library as part of > >>> bookkeeper. So > >>> > >>> 1) bookkeeper has a higher level log api, provideing named logs over > >>> numbered ledgers. it would make the usage of bookkeeper simpler and > help > >>> grow more usage in bookkeeper > >>> > >>> 2) it would make distributedlog library shipped as part of bookkeeper > >>> release. It will make the users of distributedlog library easier, > because > >>> they just need install bookkeeper and use dlog api. An integrated > release > >>> procedure will provide better user experiences. > >>> > >>> Details are proposed in the BP pull request: > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1025 > >>> > >>> Please take a look. Comments are welcome. > >>> > >>> > >>> (I have already voted a big +1 on GitHub) > >>> > >>> > >>> Side question: > >>> > >>> Will the +1 on the Pull Request be valid as official "VOTE" or should > we > >>> start an email thread ? > >>> > >> > >> > >> Yes +1 / approve on the pull request is the vote for the new BP > workflow. > >> > >> > >>> > >>> This is an important change, to me rules are not very clear with the > new > >>> github BP workflow, I knew on ASF it is important that all votes are > done > >>> by means of official mailing lists > >>> > >> > >> ASF requires all the conversations recorded in the ASF mailing list, > >> which all the github notifications are already sent and kept in > issues@b.a.o > >> mailing list. > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Enrico > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> - Sijie > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Enrico Olivelli Software Development Manager @Diennea Tel.: (+39) 0546 > >>> 066100 - Int. 925 Viale G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA) MagNews - > >>> E-mail Marketing Solutions http://www.magnews.it Diennea - Digital > >>> Marketing Solutions http://www.diennea.com > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> > >>> Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter per rimanere aggiornato su digital ed > >>> email marketing! http://www.magnews.it/newsletter/ > >>> > >>> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally > >>> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the > sender > >>> immediately and destroy this email. Any unauthorized, direct or > indirect, > >>> disclosure, copying, storage, distribution or other use is strictly > >>> forbidden. > >>> > >> > >> > > >
