On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Martin Bochnig <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Alexander Eremin <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 04:04 +0300, Martin Bochnig wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Brian Jester <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > I had the same issue on my Sun Netra CP3260 with Emtech IPV-ARTM-VURDR, >>> > here's the warning messages: >>> > >>> > WARNING: /p...@0/p...@0/p...@8/p...@0/p...@1/p...@0/disp...@1 doesn't >>> > support terminal emulation mode; switching to virtual console. >>> > WANRING: consconfig: cannot find driver for screen device >>> > /p...@0/p...@0/p...@8/p...@0/p...@1/p...@0/disp...@1 >>> > >>> > But the serial console works fine, however, I'd prefer to use the USB >>> > keyboard and monitor, not a serial cable. >>> >>> >>> This has nothing to do with being MilaX or vanilla OpenSolaris. >>> The question is sun4v vs. sun4u. >>> If this system has no Sun-supported frame buffer inside, with >>> installed /dev/fb driver that already supports TEM, then you have to >>> use serial or ALOM console. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> distribution-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/distribution-discuss >> >> Thanks Martin >> -- >> ::alhazred > > > > > > Hi Alex, > 100% welcome. > > > p.s. I was involved in a project, where exactly the same question arose. > Here is a link to a recent discussion about exactly this topic: > > http://www.pubbs.net/201002/opensolaris/20419-driver-discuss-console-frame-buffer-for-sun4v.html > http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=457918 > > > If anything could help, then creating xorg.conf and adding this option to it: > > xorg.conf: > > Section "ServerFlags" > Option "AllowEmptyInput" "False" > EndSection > > > But for this you must of course be using Xorg, not Xsun. > We tested this with our project´s own heavily patched Xorg. Not sure > if you can get Sun´s default version to work around the TEM problem in > this manner.
Ok, clarification: This just means, we did not test it. But normally nothing I am aware of speaks against it, as xorg.conf is parsed in the same way by both SPARC-Xorg versions in question. > > %mab > _______________________________________________ distribution-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/distribution-discuss
