At 12:50 AM 7/18/2009 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
On 7/17/09 11:47 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Chris McDonough<[email protected]> writes:
You gotta realize that fielding all these bikeshed emails takes a lot
of time; if it gets named "distribute" or one of the two options from
the poll, so be it. Give the poor man a mail-responding rest. ;-)
Agreed.
There's all of eternity to bikeshed the name after the first release,
but a release is required for there to be anything to bikeshed about.
I couldn't disagree more. Discussing the name *after* release will be
even less useful because it's so much more difficult to actually change
it at that point.
Note that the primary package name that the "distribute"
distribution embeds is still named "setuptools" at this point, for
better or worse. I don't know how long this will be true, but it's
still true right now, and I suspect it won't change before the first
release. That may be another can of worms, but at this point it's
probably not worth losing any sleep over.
In any case, changing the distribution name ("distribute" currently)
is pretty trivial in comparison to changing a package name because
imports don't need to change. I'd begin to get more nervous when
the package names change. ;-)
Also, this entire discussion may be moot if, as I'm currently
understanding it, this is simply a matter of other people doing
maintenance and bug fixes to the 0.6 branch... in which case there
is a very strong possibility that I'll just bless various versions of
it as official 0.6 versions of setuptools.
(One obstacle to this actually happening, though, is the part where
they're stripping out my release tools, like wikiup.cfg,
version+version.dat, etc., as I would need to add these back in order
to actually do a release.)
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
