Gerry Reno wrote: > Andrew Straw wrote: >> Gerry Reno wrote: >> >>> Then I'm ok then with having 'bdist_deb' be the name and using the >>> plugin approach. >>> >>> Andrew, what do you think about this solution? >>> >> It's already committed as of a couple days ago in the "old-stable" >> branch and I just merged it into the master branch. >> >> I'll release 0.3.1 (from the old-stable branch) and 0.4 (from the master >> branch) with this soon. >> >> -Andrew >> > In reviewing the gerry-reno git branch and the old-stable branch I > don't see where there are any user-options declared in > stdeb/command/bdist_deb.py. Shouldn't the same user-options be there > as are in sdist_dsc.py? The 'bdist_deb' command usefulness would be > very limited without the ability to pass options to it and hence to > 'sdist_dsc'. What options do you want to pass to it? bdist_deb does very little other than call dpkg-buildpackage on the result of sdist_dsc.
As far as how -- that's standard distutils. You should be able to follow the lead from the sdist_dsc command, for example. (I'm still waiting for github come come 100% back online.) -Andrew _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig