Greetings Packagers, as part of our sprinting effort at Montréal-Python, we found it relevant to give an easy access to the test coverage reports to sprinters because it really helps them to see what needs more testing and when kind of breakage then can expect the tests to catch.
I tried to use nose but the naming convention used seem to trigger way too many false positives so I'm afraid that we have to rule distutils2 as nose-incompatible. I could add a series of commands to our wiki, which is good for us but not very helpful to other distutils2 hackers, or I could integrate coverage in the current `runtests.py` test runner. Is there anyone one against adding a --with coverage option to `runtests.py`? Cheers, -- Yannick Gingras http://ygingras.net http://montrealpython.org -- lead organizer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
