On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Yannick Gingras <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greetings Packagers, > as part of our sprinting effort at Montréal-Python, we found it > relevant to give an easy access to the test coverage reports to > sprinters because it really helps them to see what needs more testing > and when kind of breakage then can expect the tests to catch. > > I tried to use nose but the naming convention used seem to trigger way > too many false positives so I'm afraid that we have to rule distutils2 > as nose-incompatible. > > I could add a series of commands to our wiki, which is good for us but > not very helpful to other distutils2 hackers, or I could integrate > coverage in the current `runtests.py` test runner. Is there anyone > one against adding a --with coverage option to `runtests.py`?
Good idea, let me know when it's up in your clone, and I'll review/pull it Notice that this script is the basis for the soon-to-be-set Hudson CI server, so we will be able to run a daily coverage report of some sort we can publish -- if you take care of making it possible to output HTML. Thanks, Tarek > > Cheers, > > -- > Yannick Gingras > http://ygingras.net > http://montrealpython.org -- lead organizer > > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig > > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
