On Jun 3, 2013, at 2:22 AM, Chris Withers <ch...@simplistix.co.uk> wrote:

> On 03/06/2013 03:43, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
>> 
>>> Some people are saying "files uploaded" vs. "downloadable packages".
>>> I don't like the "files uploaded" criterion because IMO it's a
>>> perfectly valid use case to list a package on PyPI which is only
>>> available via external revision control.
>> 
>> Sorry, if you haven't had time to follow lately we have already begun 
>> deprecating this system.
> 
> I hope you're misunderstanding what pje is saying; this isn't about hosting 
> distributions elsewhere, this is about having a PyPI listing for a project 
> that is under development but it hasn't got to the point where it's sensible 
> for a release to be made.
> 
>>> Heck, a project that only has planning documents and a reasonably
>>> active mailing list should still qualify for PyPI listing, else the
>>> original distutils-sig would not have qualified for reserving the name
>>> "distutils" on PyPI, before its first release.  ;-)
>> 
>> If a reasonably active project doesn't have anything to show after six 
>> months, I think we have different definitions of 'reasonably active'.
> 
> ...or different definitions of 'software quality' ;-)
> 
> Seriously, I don't think anyone would argue that we have enough nested list 
> printers in this world or that a package without any contact details or 
> description is fair game to delete, but I must echo what others have said in 
> that a unilateral process where a project is deleted without the owner being 
> given a reasonable time to respond doesn't seem like a good idea.

Unless I missed it I don't think I've seen *anyone* suggest that projects where 
the authors appear to actually have plans to use the name have the name yanked 
out from underneath them.

> 
> cheers,
> 
> Chris
> 
> -- 
> Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
>            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
> _______________________________________________
> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig


-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to