On 03/06/2013 08:13, Donald Stufft wrote:
If a reasonably active project doesn't have anything to show after
six months, I think we have different definitions of 'reasonably active'.
...or different definitions of 'software quality' ;-)
Seriously, I don't think anyone would argue that we have enough nested
list printers in this world or that a package without any contact
details or description is fair game to delete, but I must echo what
others have said in that a unilateral process where a project is
deleted without the owner being given a reasonable time to respond
doesn't seem like a good idea.
Unless I missed it I don't think I've seen *anyone* suggest that
projects where the authors appear to actually have plans to use the name
have the name yanked out from underneath them.
...in that case, I'm happy to find out I have misunderstood :-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
