On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4 December 2013 21:13, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Besides the issues you mention, the problem is that it creates a single > > point of failure. I really appreciate everything Christoph does, but it's > > not appropriate as the default way to provide binary releases for a large > > number of projects. There needs to be a reproducible way that the devs of > > each project can build wheels - this includes the right metadata, but > > ideally also a good way to reproduce the whole build environment > including > > compilers, blas/lapack implementations, dependencies etc. The latter > part is > > probably out of scope for this list, but is discussed right now on the > > numfocus list. > > You're right - what I said ignored the genuine work being done by the > rest of the scientific community to solve the real issues involved. I > apologise, that wasn't at all fair. > No need to apologize at all. Ralf
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
