On 19 January 2015 at 17:45, Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> writes: > >> If you'd like to volunteer for the task of reverse engineering and >> properly documenting how sdists work (with regression tests!), that >> would be quite awesome. Not necessarily *fun* from your point of view, >> but definitely awesome from my point of view :) > > I'll embark on that work and see how far I get. Thanks for identifying > that as a desirable area to work on. > > The contribution will be licensed under Apache License version 2.0 > equally to all recipients (i.e. not signing a PSF-specific agreement). > Is there a way that can be accepted?
Yes, the CLA is only necessary for CPython and the standard library itself, courtesy of the fun history with CNRI that currently requires relicensing of contributions to a Python specific license. For projects under the PyPA banner, including packaging.python.org, license in = license out is fine. That text is CC-BY-SA, so including Apache Licensed text shouldn't pose any problems. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
