Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> writes: > For projects under the PyPA banner, including packaging.python.org, > license in = license out is fine. That text is CC-BY-SA, so including > Apache Licensed text shouldn't pose any problems.
Okay. So with which repository from <URL:https://bitbucket.org/pypa/> should I start? Where would the documentation go, where would the regression tests go? You appear to be distinguishing the license for executable code versus non-executable documentation. What license conventions should I be aware of? If these are answered in a “hacking” document somewhere, a response pointing me to that document would be fine. -- \ “Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.” (“Whatever is | `\ said in Latin, sounds profound.”) —anonymous | _o__) | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
