On 6 March 2015 at 23:01, Donald Stufft <[email protected]> wrote: > Tooling wise, Github PRs work well for us. I don’t (and I don’t believe that > any of the other core devs) have any major issues with them. > > Github issues on the other hand, they function “OK” but it would be nice to > have something that we can allow anyone to modify the state of tickets to > help with triage. However even this isn’t a super pressing concern because > our ticket count is small enough that I don’t think there’s likely to be too > many to be handled by people commenting on issues and a core team coming in > to change things. However if someone has a proposal for a different issue > tracker (and plans for how to migrate to it), personally I’d be willing to > listen.
I'm also fine with github. I don't have an issue with the issue tracker, although as Donald says it would be helpful if it had a concept of "tracker privileges" separate from "core committer". But that's *not* a big enough concern to me that I'd want to go to a different tool. Paul _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
