On 7 March 2015 at 09:01, Donald Stufft <[email protected]> wrote: > > F/OSS tooling is nice, but I honestly care a whole lot less about that and a > lot more about whatever tooling is the most effective for us to get the job > done. This can include hosted services (and possibly even hosted services that > cost money). Written in Python is also nice, but again I honestly don’t care > about that nearly as much as I care about the tooling being effective.
Right, that's why I suggested GerritHub or Phabricator as possibilities for consideration, based on my interpretation of some of the concerns raised, since they both allow the GitHub repos to remain the "single source of truth", while adding some additional process options around them. However, it sounds like there aren't any current major tooling issues aside from GitHub's lack of support for a "Triager" level of permissions, so even the idea of potentially adopting your own suggested Phabricator+GitHub approach wouldn't rank very high on pip's process improvement list at this point. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
