On 06/22/2011 08:39 PM, Douglas W Philips wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Hussein Shafie <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Before implementing a workaround, please allow us for a few days to > check whether supporting both [A] and [B] in ditac 2.0 is technically > feasible. > > If this is feasible, we intend to release ditac 2.0.3 in the next few > days. In such case, the files allowing us to reproduce the bug about the > mangling of numeric ids (a bug that we were not able to reproduce) which > would be really welcome. (Please understand that we would like to solve > as much issues as possible for v2.0.3.) > > If supporting both [A] and [B] is not feasible, we'll send you an email > confirming that you'll have a find a workaround. > > > Thank you! I can only afford to wait until Monday June 27th.
OK. You'll receive some news before that date. > Until such time I will work on the examples where we are seeing problems > with numeric ids. > -D > > > > > -- > XMLmind DITA Converter Support List > [email protected] > http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/ditac-support -- XMLmind DITA Converter Support List [email protected] http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/ditac-support
