Hi Myrle,

Could you please include me as well? My full name is Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
<[email protected]>

Thank you so much,
Aizhamal

*From: *Jim Jagielski <[email protected]>
*Date: *Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:42 AM
*To: * <[email protected]>


>
> > On May 8, 2019, at 11:53 AM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:34 AM Jim Jagielski <[email protected] <mailto:
> [email protected]>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Because Sam told me to.
> >
> > I asked you to discuss it with her and try to build consensus.
> > Instead you took a position, and asked her to convince you.
> >
>
> For the record, this is what I wrote. One will note that Sam's
> "description" does not accurately match what I wrote but rather spins a
> narrative in a way that supports his statement about "power dynamics" and,
> as such, the need for it to be a prez cmmt.:
>
> Gris,
>
> One of the issues is why this needs to be a President's cmmt. I am fully
> willing to approve it as a PMC but have serious concerns about it being a
> prez cmmt, esp since it is NOT an operational task, and operations (and
> operations alone) are truly under the purview of the President's office.
> Even in the vote being done on ComDev, people have stated that they are OK
> w/ D&I being "spun out" from ComDev but want the board to determine the
> best format for the cmmt.
>
> So why a President's cmmt? Why not a PMC?
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to