Michael Scherer wrote:
using "standalone yes", then setting the c2s port will have a different
impact than doing it in the reverse order, and i think this can be quite
confusing.
I am not very keen of having a option that act like some kind of alias
for 2 other options, it can only lead to confusion.
I'm inclined to agree. I wonder if the following could work:
ClientPort none
ServerPort none
Since "none" is neither an address:port pair, a port number nor an
absolute path to a UNIX domain socket I don't think it should cause any
troubles.
