Hi,
Em Feb 5, 2007, às 8:05 AM, Martin Atkins escreveu:
Michael Scherer wrote:
using "standalone yes", then setting the c2s port will have a
different
impact than doing it in the reverse order, and i think this can be
quite
confusing. I am not very keen of having a option that act like
some kind of alias
for 2 other options, it can only lead to confusion.
I'm inclined to agree. I wonder if the following could work:
ClientPort none
ServerPort none
eheh :)
I coded that one first, then went for the other because I wanted to
disable some warnings about Local delivery components also...
Im fine with both... No clear preference.
Do you want my patch to support none as a port?
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use Jabber!
