On 8/30/05, Chris Ryland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are people working on such things? (I know the answer is partially yes,
> because I've noticed various efforts underway here and there.) What's
> the prognosis?

Because we (World Online) have been using Django for about two years
while we've been developing it, we have much of this stuff already
done for our internal purposes -- but we don't have the OK to
open-source it. Actually, we sell a commercial package, called
Ellington, which includes a great news CMS, polls, events calendar,
band database, etc. -- all the software that powers lawrence.com and
ljworld.com. One of the official reasons for open-sourcing Django was
to get people interested in that.

Aside from that, I (personally) would be totally cool with hosting
some sort of app repository for common stuff -- a blog system, a wiki,
etc.

Similarly, the /django/contrib/ part of the source tree is designed
for add-on functionality that's inessential to Django itself but is
useful from a "batteries included" perspective. It currently includes
only our comments framework, but I'm keen on adding more. I'm not sure
whether a full-blown blogging system would be a candidate for contrib,
though -- I pictured contrib as more of a place for "framework
additions" than standalone apps.

Adrian

-- 
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org

Reply via email to