On 12/29/05, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have read that page - I didn't realize that it was actually > happening, though. The implication at the end of the wiki entry seemed > to be that there was still some discussion needed as to whether it was > a good idea.
I'd say we're 80% confident it will happen. We still have a couple of other things to flesh out. > If it _is_ happening, does this put back the schedule for merging > magic-removal back into the trunk? For that matter, what is the > current thought on the schedule for this merge? (last I heard, it was > "trying for end of year"...) Here's the current status: Robert is going to finish up manipulator tweaks by the end of the week, when he leaves for a week-long vacation. After that, Jacob is going to Ajaxify the admin edit-inline objects. After that, we'll evaluate descriptor fields and implement that if we decide to go ahead with it. Finally, we'll start encouraging people to test out the branch, and, if all goes well, it'll be in good shape for merging. There are other features in our to-do list, such as the UnitOfWork concept (essentially transactions), but that's not backwards-incompatible. Can anybody think of other backwards-incompatible changes that we'd want to roll into magic-removal before trunk? Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org
