On 1/12/06, Arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've had a closer look at ticket #1165 where the wrong SQL column name > is used for PositiveIntegerFields. The problem is that the data type > for foreignKeys gets derived from its referenced field with the > __dict__ of the referenced field. This is correct for fields like > CharFields, where i.e. maxlength is needed but wrong for types where > a column name is needed. At present this is only for > PositiveIntegerFields and PositiveSmallIntegerField the case.
Hey Arthur, Thanks for reporting this bug and submitting a patch! I just committed it -- I think it's as elegant of a solution as we can get at this point. If any future fields have a constraint, let's cross that bridge when we come to it. Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org
