>It's not clear to me that inline comments were outright rejected here.
>Perhaps I missed some other discussion but to my biased eye the
>general concensus was favourable.

I remember several situations where Adrian and Jacob rejected an inline
comment syntax (IRC, tickets, group). I found one directly in the
ticket system:

http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/648

That's why I said "shot down often enough to stop the discussion". Even
though it might be neat to vote on something, at least it should be a
something where the core devs didn't outright dump the idea earlier on.
Or if it is, at least bring new arguments to the table that address
their complaints ;-)

I myself am -0 on inline comment syntax. Reason: comments in templates
just don mix up for me. I don't see much reason in putting _template_
comments in there, except as blocks - and in those cases there is
already the {% comment %} syntax. For other cases web designers will
much more naturally use HTML comments, as that's the syntax they
already know about.

Actually comments that don't show up in the generated HTML aren't
really that useful for design, anyways: as templates do generate HTML,
and that HTML is quite complex, you _want_ your comments to show up in
the result, so you can use them as landmarks in the source view.

Actually the only reason I see for {% comment %} at all is to disable a
block of template code - and therefore I would actually prefer it to be
renamed to {% disable %} :-)

bye, Georg


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to