On Friday 31 March 2006 18:57, Luke Plant wrote: > So the issue here is entirely to do with an intermediate web cache, > and from what I can tell > ( http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec13.html#sec13 ), the > cache is behaving itself perfectly well - since the page had no > 'Expires' header, caches are allowed to use heuristic mechanisms to > guess an expiration and cache until then.
Actually, reading more closely I found this: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec13.html#sec13.4 So it was probably misbehaving. Luke -- A woman's mind is cleaner than a man's. She changes it more often. (Oliver Herford) Luke Plant || L.Plant.98 (at) cantab.net || http://lukeplant.me.uk/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
