Michael Radziej wrote: > > You're right. We should go from settings.ROOT_URLCONF downward, anyway, > and not take any url module as parameter, which wouldn't work out in > reality. > > I'm not saying this is the solution. But I think this is the way to go. > > Anybody else interested in this at all, or am I wasting my time?
Short answer: yes, many people want this problem to be solved. In fact it was debated ~6 months ago here: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/672 (rather inappropriate place to have discussions). We discussed different approaches to the problem, use cases we want to solve, and ... we didn't have a good solution. Look the ticket up and see, if you can extract anything useful. Thanks, Eugene --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
