Joseph, On 5/30/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone tested out the multi-auth branch yet? I haven't heard > anything, so either people aren't using it, or it's working well and > the docs are good enough. Personally, I've been using it with both > external SQL and LDAP backends for over a month now. No issues, but my > apps are internal and don't get much traffic. >
Last night I put together a PAMBackend that uses pyPAM to authenticate users against Linux PAM. With this I achieved something that could be the key for deploying the (first :-) Django based app at work (because, paradojically enough, every M$ based web apps already installed there force us [users] to remeber a different set of username/password, there isn´t single sign on). This is the scenario: django+multi-auth - PAMBackend - PAM - winbind - Old WinNT4 domain controller It´s working ok so far. It is simply a plain mixin of your setting-based backend multi-auth sample and the example program shipped with PyPAM but I will post it to the wiki page for review tomorrow after refactoring it a little bit. I understand that by modifiying the relevant /etc/pam.d/<pam service name> file other auth backends could be used (unix password, ...) Thanks for your work. -- Ramiro Morales --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
