On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 20:20 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 14:04 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> > I'd like to draw some attention to ticket 
> > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2232 (mainly russelm's attention as 
> >   it appeared after his checkin 3195).
> > 
> > Basically ManyToMany relations don't work when you try to get related 
> > queryset from a model where ManyToManyField is defined. Or is it just me?
> 
> Pretty much "just you", but it's obviously a little trickier than that.
> This is basically ticket #1796 occurring again. You'll find it will only
> fail in some very specific cases and it's dependent upon both your
> machine and your Python build.
> 
> The patch labelled ManyToMany.patch in ticket #1796 might well fix your
> problem in the short-term. I tend to agree with Luke (see his last
> comment on that ticket) that it's probably the completely correct fix,

".. probably NOT the completely correct fix."  Oh dear, an unfortunate
typo.

> rather a correction after the fact of the problem. But we might have to
> check it in for now until we work out the deeper mystery there (which
> could well just be that things imported from different paths cannot be
> identified with each other reliably and so we can't fix this).
> 
> Are the tests failing for you, too, Ivan? I just ran them (and my code
> is up to date) and also tested out a few apps I have here using
> ManyToMany and I saw no problem.
> 
> I'm looking at #1796 now. Will try to check in something reasonable if I
> can in the next couple of hours (although I can't actually replicate the
> problem, so I'll probably just have to Use The Force or something).

Malcolm


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to