On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 14:15 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Jun 28, 2006, at 11:45 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > > For things like applications/atomserv+xml and related ones (basically, > > everything else), data should be left unprocessed by the Django > > layers, > > I would have thought. For example, an Atom publishing request contains > > XML data that can't be treated like a form. And the application needs > > access to the raw data to process it. > > Am I missing something or isn't ``request.raw_post_data`` what you > need? AFAIK, ``request.POST`` and friends are lazy-loading, and you > can just access ``request.raw_post_data`` to get the, um, raw post data. > > (See http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/request_response/ > #attributes). > > Is that what you need, or am I being dense?
One of us is being dense, but it isn't you. :-( All this looks much easier after a bit of sleep. Not sure what I was doing last night. Thanks for pointing out the obvious: raw_data will do what I want and all the HTTP headers are supplied correctly. So there's nothing much missing. Just my brains. Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
