On 7/14/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to be clear - I'm not even going to pretend that what I have implemented is a replacement/comparable with nose. It is an attempt at a very basic test running framework extending unittest and doctest. Along the way, it also acts as a testbed for factoring out the pieces of code that are needed to set up and run tests (such as DB setup/teardown), with hooks for more complex functionality. It uses the existing Django test cases as a proof of concept.
Russ %-)
Now, what's the license of nose? Perhaps we could bundle it with
Django (as we've done with PyDispatcher and Simplejson)? In my
(limited) messing with Django & nose I've been pretty happy so far
(but I've not played with Russell's patch for comparison).
Just to be clear - I'm not even going to pretend that what I have implemented is a replacement/comparable with nose. It is an attempt at a very basic test running framework extending unittest and doctest. Along the way, it also acts as a testbed for factoring out the pieces of code that are needed to set up and run tests (such as DB setup/teardown), with hooks for more complex functionality. It uses the existing Django test cases as a proof of concept.
Russ %-)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
