On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 7/14/06, Gary Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And so are we keeping is_anonymous or deprecating it?  I guess it  
>> would
>> still be useful for determining whether on not your object is an
>> AnonymousUser instance, which seems to be it's original intent.   
>> We can
>> keep it and just change the docs to use is_authenticated.
>
> Yeah, I tend to agree with this solution (changing the docs to use
> is_authenticated or whatever the name of the new method is).

I agree -- keep is_anonymous but emphasize is_authenticated in the docs.

Jacob

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to