On 06/09/2006, at 11:19 PM, GinTon wrote:
> > it did not matter to me to use the New BSD license, although I would > prefer to use the following one of CC who is compatible with BSD and > not viric (it's different of avobe) > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ > > But David Pratt demands in the next message the exclusive use of the > BDS license > http://groups.google.com/group/django-ecommerce/tree/browse_frm/ > thread/ed90b6f909964621/768c2c4fc956dd2e?rnum=31&_done=%2Fgroup% > 2Fdjango-ecommerce%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fed90b6f909964621%3Ftvc% > 3D1%26#doc_d39bacb4bcd0093a I'm not a lawyer, but it is my understanding that the Creative Commons license is not viral in the slightest, and is complementary to the source code license. CC is on the copy/text, and is more a explicit granting of what is permissible. (by default ALL text is copyrighted, and not copyable). the only 'viral' in my reading is '4b as long as chris (the owner of the ecommerce code) is happy with the type of CC license you put in there it should be fine. ` > > and my surprise has been great when I have seen that to the > projects of > google that license is not demanded to them althought it is advised > http://code.google.com/soc/django/about.html > > Then: > > 1) Has more preference the contributors of Google summer code that the > one independents? > 2) Is possible use licenses compatibles con BSD as MIT or CC-by? -- Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] join http://gypsyjobs.com the marketplace for django developers --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
