On 9/22/06, Simon de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Fair enough - you're free to discuss your ideas. > > For this thread, I'd prefer sticking to ideas on whether to implement the > HTTP methods in the urlresolver and if the idea is any good - how this could > be done. > > Right now the urlresolver works with strings or functions, not dictionaries. > Adding dictionaries to the urlpatterns increases the complexity a bit and > introduces a complete new concept & behaviour.
Just because I saw dict might be accepted if the original advice is passed, so I come out that if we can use "dict" more deeply. Of cause, even the dict is accepted in url, my proposal may never be accepted at all. So just skip it. > > I'd prefer a simple solution that will allow you to specify the HTTP method > for a view without adding noise to the whole urlresolver. > > Any ideas? > -- I like python! My Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou UliPad Site: http://wiki.woodpecker.org.cn/moin/UliPad UliPad Maillist: http://groups.google.com/group/ulipad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
