James Bennett wrote: > My personal preference would be to specify an interface that comments > have to implement, and then let the actual model be whatever the > developer wants; maybe a subclass of django.contib.models.Comment, > maybe not. That feels like it'd give the maximum flexibility, and also > feels a bit more natural in terms of Python -- rather than having to > *be* a Comment, it just has to be able to *act like* a Comment.
+1 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
