On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 10:58 -0400, Benjamin Slavin wrote: > On 5/14/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we should try to stay with the "cleaning" line of thinking, > > rather than validate- or normalise-related terms, just for consistency, > > though. > > Agreed. > > > What about clean_data -> cleaned_data and maintain clean_*() > > The biggest down side is that clean_data is already documented... but > it's an easy find-replace
That was exactly why I didn't change clean_data (my initial "fix" was just to name it cleaned_data). It's already used in lots of code, so the impact of change it is larger. Changing the undocumented feature is less disruptive. Unnecessarily intrusive backwards-incompat changes seem mean. Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
