Right, check out the ticket again - new patch up. http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4115
On May 17, 1:19 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The most common use case is that someone wants to create the <img> tag > with the appropriate height and width. If the incorrect values are > put in, then the browser might try to scale the image which is not > what we want. > > I'm not opposed to modifying the tag to return the actual size by > using PIL calls. It's probably not too big of a performance hit and > if people don't really want to use it they don't have to. > > On May 16, 3:58 am, "Chris Beaven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 5/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The other alternative might be to cache the file sizes and return it > > > that way. The benfit is that the filenames are cleaner but the > > > downside might be the complexity. > > > Or we just keep it the way it is ;) > > > Is there really that much benefit to having the thumbnail image > > filename contain the actual dimensions? If someone cared that much, > > they can use PIL (on the thumbnailed image) to find them out. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
