> Aside from the "urgh!" factor from writing the content in multiple > times, if you are going to do this, why not just create a "reuse-block" > tag that re-inserts the block value the template parser has already > worked out previously? Doesn't need any change to the behaviour of > "block" then. > As I see it, because you: 1. Add another tag that users should be aware of. 2. Encourage users to do what James was afraid that they will do.
I don't see this as "changing the behavior of blocks". I think my suggestion is merely to relax the restriction - multiple blocks with the same name are not disallowed altogether - they are allowed, as long as they all have the same content. Noam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
