I'd like to see alternative session backends so that I can write one that uses memcached (which I use as standard on any high traffic PHP sites I write).
Cheers, Mike buriy wrote: >>> However, that's a good reason to have sessions pluggable -- if >>> persistence is important, then you need db sessions. >>> > > What about file for sessions like in php? I want sessions to be very > fast, but > memory solution is bad for development and production because you lose > all your session data between restarts. > sqlite is too heavy for them, but multithread and multiprocess access > should be supported anyway. bsddb backend maybe? +1 for this one. I > can write such one. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
